Articles

Research methods in behavioral economics and neuroeconomics

Vasil Stoyanov — Sofia University St. Kliment Ohridski
Published: 01.02.2017

Abstract

The reasons leading to the emergence of behavioural economics as a distinct field of economics in the mid-twentieth century are briefly presented. The four main research methods used in behavioral economics are discussed in chronological and historical order: laboratory experiments involving alternative hypothetical choices; laboratory experiments involving real rewards for participants; field studies; and conducting experiments in real settings. We also review two other research methods that are used primarily in the field of neuroeconomics - functional magnetic resonance imaging and transcranial magnetic stimulation.

References

Babcock, L., Wang Xianghong, G. Loewenstein (1996). Choosing the wrong pond: Social comparisons in negotiations that reflect a self-serving bias. - Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 110, p. 1-19.

Camerer, C., L. Babcock, G. Loewenstein, R. Thaler (1997). Labor supply of New York City cabdrivers: One day at a time. - Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 112, p. 407-441.

Camerer, C. F. & R. M. Hogarth (1999). The effects of financial incentives in experiments: A review and capital-labor-production framework. - Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Vol. 19, p. 7-42.

Camerer, C. F. & G. Loewenstein (2003). Behavioral economics: Past, present, future. – In: Camerer, C., G. Loewenstein and M. Rabin (eds.). Advances in Behavioral Economics. New York and Princeton: Russell Sage Foundation Press and Princeton University Press, p. 3-51.

Camerer, C., G. Loewenstein, Prelec Drazen (2005). Neuroeconomics: How neuroscience can inform economics. - Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 43, p. 9-64.

Choi, J. J., D. Laibson, B. C. Madrian (2005). Are empowerment and education enough? Underdiversification in 401(k) Plans. - Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Vol. 2, p. 151-198.

Duflo, E. & E. Saez (2002). Participation and investment decisions in a retirement plan: the influence of colleagues’ choices. - Journal of Public Economics, Vol. 85, p. 121-148.

Egbert, H. & M. Greiff (2016). A Survey of the Empirical Evidence on PWYW Pricing. Bulgarian Economic Papers, 02-2016.

Gardner, H. (1987). The mind's new science: A history of the cognitive revolution. New York: Basic Books.

Genesove, D. & Ch. Mayer (2001). Loss aversion and seller behavior: Evidence from the housing market. - Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 116, N 4, p. 1233- 1260.

Grether, D. & Ch. Plott (1979). Economic Theory of Choice and the Preference Reversal Phenomenon. - The American Economic Review, Vol. 69, N 4 (September), p. 623-638.

Harrison, G. & J. A. List (2004). Field experiments. - Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 42, p. 1013-1059.

Kahneman, D. & A. Tversky (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. - Econometrica, Vol. 47, p. 263-291.

Kahneman, D., J. L. Knetsch, H. R. Thaler (1990). Experimental tests of the endowment effect and the Coase theorem. - Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 98, p. 1325-1348.

Kim, Ju-Young, K. Kaufmann, M. Stegemann (2014). The impact of buyer- seller relationships and reference prices on the effectiveness of the pay what you want pricing mechanism. - Marketing Letters, Vol. 25, p. 409-423.

Knoch, D., P.-L. Alvaro, K. Meyer, V. Treyer, E. Fehr (2006). Diminishing reciprocal fairness by disrupting the right prefrontal cortex. - Science 3, Vol. 314 (5800), p. 829-832.

Lambert, C. A. (2006). The marketplace of perceptions. - Harvard Magazine, March-April, p. 50-95.

Lichtenstein, S. & P. Slovic (1971). Reversals of preference between bids and choices in gambling decisions. - Journal of Experimental Psychology, Vol. 89, p. 46-55.

Neill, H. R., R. G. Cummings, Ph. Ganderton, G. W. Harrison & Th. McGuckin (1994). Hypothetical surveys and real economic commitments. - Land economics, Vol. 70, N 2, p. 145-154.

Sanfey, A. G., J. K. Rilling, J. A. Aronson, L. E. Nystrom, J. D. Cohen (2003). The neural basis of economic decision-making in the ultimatum game. - Science, Vol. 300, p. 1755-1757.

Weber, R. & R. Dawes (2005). Behavioral economics. – In: Smelser, N. J. & R. Swedberg (eds.). The handbook of economic sociology (2nd ed.). Princeton: Princeton University Press, p. 90-108.