Online learning from the perspective of the marketing product and its levels. An empirical example from Bulgaria
Abstract
The pandemic, which began in 2020, has affected all areas of human activity. Education was also one of them, and its rapid adaptation to the new reality was a condition for guaranteeing the level of its quality. In order to comply with the recommendations for action during a pandemic, the educational process was moved entirely online. This process took place literally over the span of a single day, wherein the physical classrooms became virtual, and the teachers and students were faced with the challenge of changing their previous approaches in order to respond and deal with the situation. In this regard, for the purposes of the present paper, the understanding of online learning in higher education is reduced to the level of a marketing product, as a part of the marketing mix. The different levels of the product in the context of online learning are examined, as well as the factors that lead to the success of the products. The advantages, disadvantages and opportunities for improving online learning in higher education are studied based on own empirical research conducted among 230 students at different universities.
Keywords
JEL Classification
References
Anderson, T. (2004). The Theory and Practice Of Online Learning, 2nd ed. Edmonton: AU Press, Athabasca University.
Baker, M. (2007). Product strategy and management. Harlow, Essex: Pearson Education Limited.
Baker, M. J. and Hart, S. J. (1989). Marketing and Competitive Success. London: Philip Allan.
Browne, A. B., Kaldenberg, O. D, Browne, G. W.& Brown, J. D. (1998). Student as Customer: Factors Affecting Satisfaction and Assessments of Institutional Quality. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 8 (3), pp. 1-14.
Cojocariu, V.-M., Lazar, I., Nedeff, V. & Lazar, G. (2014). SWOT analysis of e-learning educational services from the perspective of their beneficiaries. ProcediaSocial and Behavioral Sciences, 116, pp. 1999-2003.
Fiol, C. (2001). Revisiting an identity-based view of sustainable competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 27(6), pp.691-699.
Gunawan, G., Suranti, N. M. Y. & Fathoroni, F. (2020). Variations of Models and Learning Platforms for Prospective Teachers During the COVID-19 Pandemic Period. Indonesian Journal of Teacher Education 1(2), pp. 61-70.
Julyanto, O. & Purwanto, A. (2020). University Students Online Learning System During Covid-19 Pandemic: Advantages, Constraints and Solutions. Systematic Reviews in Pharmacy, 11 (7), pp. 570-576.
Kotler, P., Keller, K., Ang, S., Tan, C. & Leong, S. (2018). Marketing management. Harlow: Pearson.
Lederman, D. (2020). Evaluating teaching during the pandemic. Inside Higher Ed, (8). Available at https://www.insidehighered.com/digitallearning/article/2020/04/08/ many-colleges-are-abandoning-or-downgrading-student-evaluations
Liguori, E. & Winkler, C. (2020). From offline to online: Challenges and opportunities for entrepreneurship education following the COVID-19 pandemic. Entrepreneurship Education & Pedagogy (EE&P), 3(4), pp. 346-351.
Shivangi, D. (2020). Online Learning: A Panacea in the Time of COVID-19. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 49 (1), pp. 5-23.
Singh, M. (2012). Marketing Mix of 4P’S for Competitive Advantage. IOSR Journal of Business and Management, 3 (2), pp.40-45.
Song, L., Singleton, E. S., Hill, J. R. & Koh, M. H. (2004). Improving online learning: Student perceptions of useful and challenging characteristics. The Internet and Higher Education, 7 (1), pp. 59-70.
Wang, Y. R., Yang, W. L, Pipino, L. L. & Strong, M. S. (1998). Manage your information as a product. MIT Sloan Management Review, 39 (4) https://sloanreview. mit.edu/article/manage-your-information-as-a-product/